Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- What's Next For Pensions, Now That Court Has Tossed Illinois' Law?
- Power Players – Who’s In And Who’s Out When It Comes To Lobbying The New Governor
- Lawmakers Propose Adding Crime Victims' Bill Of Rights To Illinois Law
- New Pension Fixes May Emerge; Rauner Considering Ideas That "Haven't Been Brought Forward Yet"
- How Much Is Your AP Test Score Worth In Illinois? The Answer Varies By University
Wed September 4, 2013
Panhandling Suit Filed In Springfield
Springfield is defending its policies on panhandlers after a new lawsuit accused the city of violating free-speech rights by barring panhandlers from asking for money.
The suit filed on behalf of panhandlers this week in federal court says police wrongly tell panhandlers that what they're doing is illegal. Springfield's ordinance is a bit confusing. It prohibits vocal requests for money, but allows someone to hold a sign making a similar request. The city passed the measure back in 2007 for the downtown area.
In an e-mailed statement, city spokesman Nathan Mihelich calls panhandling ``one the most perplexing challenges facing Springfield.'' He contends that, ``by definition, panhandling is unlawful'' and ``can be a public nuisance.'' He says Springfield encourages people to donate to charities. He adds ``handouts to panhandlers only exacerbate the problem.''
Mihelich says the city is open to alternatives to a ban. But he says ``a federal lawsuit is not a path to those alternative solutions.''
The lawsuit cites one plaintiff as making less than $25 a day panhandling with a sign reading, ``Please Help Out Any Way U Can.'' It claims the 52-year-old has been arrested for panhandling.
Similar lawsuits have been filed across Illinois, including in Chicago.
The Springfield suit seeks unspecified damages.