Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- State's Paying Interest On 2011 Past Due Wages; May Finally Pay Up
- Beautiful Book Pairs Felicia Olin's Art & Vachel Lindsay's Poetry
- The Players: Inspector General's Push For Public Reports Stalls
- Plan That Would Allow Ex-Felons To Work In Schools Gets Support From Conservatives
- Listen to State Week - April 10, 2015
Thu June 12, 2014
Maybe Dinosaurs Were A Coldblooded, Warmblooded Mix
Originally published on Tue September 23, 2014 6:01 am
If you go to a zoo on a cold day and watch the snakes, you'll see what it means to be coldblooded. Not much action going on — most reptiles and other coldblooded creatures take on the temperature of their surroundings, so they tend to be most sluggish when the outside temperature is cool. The monkeys, however, act like they've had one too many cappuccinos. That's largely because they're warmblooded — their bodies have lots of tricks for actively generating heat and losing it, so they're metabolically able to move quickly and maintain their core temperature no matter how hot or cold it is outside.
Most animals are one or the other. But once upon a time, the Earth's dominant animals may have been a bit of both. We're talking dinosaurs here.
When scientists first figured out that the giant bones they'd been finding belonged to extinct, exotic creatures, they assumed they were sluggish, coldblooded things — "tail-draggers," they called them. They seemed lizardlike, so it made sense that they must have been coldblooded like lizards, soaking up heat from outside their bodies and unable to maintain a steady body temperature.
Then scientific opinion swung the other way. Smaller dinosaurs that were clearly predators might have been quicker, more high-energy, and more like warmblooded mammals and birds, whose bodies generate and maintain their own heat.
John Grady, an ecologist at the University of New Mexico, now offers a third way. "What I'm suggesting is neither," he says. "Rather, they took a middle way — kind of like Goldilocks. And it seemed to work out very well for them."
Grady thinks the "not too hot, not too cold" lifestyle was a useful adaptation by dinosaurs. After all, they evolved into a world already populated with big, slow — coldblooded — reptiles. "You know, if you are a little bit ... warmer-blooded than a reptile," he points out, "essentially your muscles fire faster; your nerves fire faster; you are a more dangerous predator."
At the same time, a bit of coldbloodedness has its own charms. You burn energy more slowly, so you don't have to eat as much to grow. (Think of a crocodile or snake that can live for a month on one meal.) "And that means maybe they could get a lot bigger than a mammal could be," Grady says, "which wouldn't be able to eat enough if it was the size of a Tyrannosaurus rex." A mammal the size of T. rex would have to eat 24/7 to feed its supercharged metabolism. Grady says it would probably starve to death.
So Grady argues that dinosaurs probably could generate body heat, though not enough to maintain a constant temperature. By compromising, they could be fast and big.
And there's evidence for this. Writing in this week's issue of the journal Science, Grady explains how his team found it.
They relied on this fact: Warmblooded animals grow faster than coldblooded ones. And the dinosaur bones showed that the creatures did, in fact, grow faster than reptiles, but not quite as fast as mammals. Grady figured that out by reading growth lines in dinosaur bones. Paleontologist Greg Erickson, at Florida State University, pioneered a way to read those lines, which are kind of like tree rings.
"I liken what we do to forensic science," Erickson says of the technique. "You have what little remains you come across to work with" — in this case, dinosaur bones.
What Grady's group did was compare many kinds of dinosaur bones with the bones of modern animals to calculate the different growth rates and, thus, metabolic rates.
Erickson says the group's finding is a clever advance in dinosaur science. "The present is the key to the past," he says. "If we can garner an understanding of how living animals work — and then we can get similar information from fossils — we can understand what happened in the past."
But what about what's happening in the present? Are there animals now that combine warmblooded and coldblooded traits? Yes, in fact, but only a few.
The echidna is one — a mammal that looks like an anteater and lays eggs. The leatherback turtle is another. And so are two of the biggest, fastest predators in the ocean: the great white shark and the tuna.
AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:
Watch a snake for a while and you'll see what it means to be cold-blooded, not a lot of action going on there. Watch the monkeys though and it's like they've had one too many cappuccinos in part because they are warm-blooded. Most animals are one or the other, but once upon a time the Earth's dominant animals may have been a bit of both. Were talking about Dinosaurs here. NPR's Christopher Joyce has the story.
CHRISTOPHER JOYCE, BYLINE: Scientists once thought dinosaurs were sluggish cold-blooded creatures. Tail draggers they called them. Like Sunbathing lizards that absorb most of their heat from outside their bodies. Then scientific opinion swung the other way, maybe dinosaurs were quicker more high-energy, more like warm-blooded mammals and birds whose bodies generate and maintain their own heat. John Grady, now offers a third way.
JOHN GRADY: What I'm suggesting is neither, rather they took a middle way. Kind of like Goldilocks and it seemed to work out very well for them.
JOYCE: Grady's an ecologist at the University of New Mexico. He thinks the not too hot or too cold lifestyle was a useful adaptation by dinosaurs. After all they evolved into a world already populated with big slow cold-blooded reptiles.
GRADY: You know if you are a little bit warmer blooded than a reptile essentially your muscles fire faster, your nerves fire faster, your kind of a more dangerous predator.
JOYCE: At the same time a bit of cold bloodedness has its charms. You burn energy more slowly so you don't have to eat as much to grow. Think of a crocodile or a snake that can live for a month on one meal.
GRADY: And that means they could maybe get a lot bigger than a mammal could be. Which wouldn't be able to eat enough if it was the size of a Tyrannosaurus rex.
JOYCE: A mammal the size of a T-Rex would have to eat 24/7 to feed its supercharged metabolism. So Grady suggests that dinosaurs probably could generate body heat but not maintain a constant temperature. That meant they could be fast and big. Writing in the journal "Science" Grady explains how his team figured all this out. They relied on this fact, warm-blooded animals grow fast and cold-blooded ones slowly. And the dinosaur bones show that they grew faster than reptiles but not quite as fast as mammals. Grady determined that from reading growth lines in dinosaur bones. They're kind of like tree rings. Paleontologist Greg Erickson at Flordia State University pioneered a way to read those rings.
GREG ERICKSON: I liken what we do to forensic science. You have what little remains you come across to work with.
JOYCE: What Grady's group did was compare those remains, dinosaur bones, with bones of modern animals.
ERICKSON: The present's the key to the past. If we can garner an understanding of how living animals work and it then we could get similar information from fossils then we can understand what happened in the past.
JOYCE: But what about the present? Are there animals now that combine warm-blooded and cold-blooded traits? Yes I few. The echidna, a mammal that looks like an ant eater and lays eggs, Some turtle and two of the biggest fastest predators in the ocean. The white shark and the tuna. Christopher Joyce NPR News.
CORNISH: You're listening to a ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.