Podcasts & RSS Feeds
Most Active Stories
- What's Next For Pensions, Now That Court Has Tossed Illinois' Law?
- Power Players – Who’s In And Who’s Out When It Comes To Lobbying The New Governor
- Lawmakers Propose Adding Crime Victims' Bill Of Rights To Illinois Law
- How Much Is Your AP Test Score Worth In Illinois? The Answer Varies By University
- New Pension Fixes May Emerge; Rauner Considering Ideas That "Haven't Been Brought Forward Yet"
Illinois Supreme Court
Mon December 23, 2013
Insurance Company Must Defend Policyholder
The Illinois Supreme Court has put a limit on just who can be excluded from a car insurance policy.
Ana Reyes is being sued for allegedly hitting two people with her car — injuring a mother and killing the woman's four-year-old.
In the lawsuit that followed, Reyes’ insurance company argued it had no duty to defend Reyes or pay the victims.
Insurance company American Access listed Reyes as the policyholder, but it also excluded her from her own policy, and made another man the primary driver.
The company’s lawyer, Keely Hillison, argues there are good reasons to allow this kind of arrangement.
“These exclusions are needed, so that families can get car insurance by excluding an unsafe or unqualified member of the family, who would otherwise prohibit an insurer from issuing a policy, or (would) make it cost-prohibitive,” Hillison told the justices when the case was argued.
But Keith Rhine, a lawyer for the accident victims’ insurance company, says that doesn’t make sense.
“Who’s then the policy for?" Rhine asked the justices. "That is the person who’s named, paying for the policy, owns the vehicle — that is the person who should be covered by this policy.”
The Supreme Court agrees, ruling that a lone policyholder cannot be excluded from her own insurance. It says allowing such insurance plans would go against the public safety reasoning behind Illinois’ mandatory car insurance law.